Havering Council officials became concerned about the lack of hygiene in the restaurant during a routine inspection in January 2012 london safety , and when Nazakat became the owner of the following month , it became aware of these concerns.
The Council was clear that improvements were implemented, including training of appropriate staff in food safety, food security flavour.chickenwritten procedures and ensure food security is protected against london safety contamination.
When other visits indicated no improvement has been a number of reports of improved hygiene were served.
Another visit in June 2012 to check the opinions were respected, giving more food safety problems that included inadequate hand washing facilities london safety, staff is not wearing scrubs, and insufficient lighting. It was almost a dirty area storage bin outside, walls, floors and kitchen equipment .
Raw chicken stored turned out to be very close to home cooking and cleaning cloth has been tested and found to contain excessive levels of Enterobacteriaceae (one associated with pathogenic bacteria that can cause food poisoning) london safety. After this visit, Havering Council decided a lawsuit was the only option .
Councillor Lesley Kelly, Cabinet Member for Public Protection, said: " It is absolutely disgusting that despite many visits and advice from our staff restaurant owner could not clean up their act and continued to violate law, health and welfare of any person who was at risk london safety .
" He openly mocked the law and I'm glad the judges saw london safety fit to impose a heavy fine.
" We want to work with local food companies to help meet food safety standards and london safety , therefore, for every company, give us a note inspect food hygiene zero, where urgent improvement , five, that is very good. residents can view the notes online before buying takeout or eat in the district. "
No comments:
Post a Comment